|
|||||||
| Penis Enlargement Surgery Forum Surgical Penis & Testicular Enlargement - Phalloplasty Patient Network - discuss penis enlargement surgery (phalloplasty), penis widening, penis lengthening, glanular enhancement. Testicular implants, scrotal webbing reduction, pubic lipo & reconstruction of previous phalloplasty. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
For history on this look for the 'Macrolane injection thread' that I started some weeks back.
So I have searched the earth emailed various consultants and clinics read articles and have used other previous research. Thanks to everyone who butted in. My conclusion was that something is a bit iffy here because many of the clinics that did offer this procedure no longer does. There was little anecdotal evidence to support a conclusion either way but Saphire who had it done was not satisfied. Only one surgeon replied. This was Roberto Viel. We had a 10 min chat and he was very helpful. He said that 18 months of having done this procedure he is returning to FFT! He said the nature of the material is not able to handle the sort of stress from say sexual intercourse very well and tends to migrate either towards the head or the base. It does not always happen he say and some people are happy however most people coming for back for a top up have opted for the FFT. I did question why he used FFT and he said that he had been doing this for twenty years now and that he considers his method very succesful. He often does it in four stages he says the best results are on a normal sized penis and with a moderate amount of fat for a aesthetic result. Rather than pumping it full which is when you have a bigger chance of deformations lumps etc. Anyway for one of the busiest penis surgeons to prefer FFT to Macrolane having done both procedure is enough for me. I am going to stay average for awhile ! I am going to see him for a consult re some Gyno and I will ask him some more about it and let you know. Until then thanks to everyone who read hope it helped. JAM |
|
|||
|
that viel is taking the piss! what a dick (pun intended) for him to push that method and its long term effects so hard for the last 2 years and suddenly decide not to do it. proves that its always been about the money and thry dont care who they use as guinea pigs. imagine him still pushing fft even after the whole world (except giunta) says its a dumb idea.
no wonder he can afford to get sued for megabucks from the likes of pete burns its sad because macrolane seemed like a good idea. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
FFT is Free fat transfer, this is when they liposuction fat from your body and inject it into the penis |
|
|||
|
thought the fat will finally disaolve by the body,macrolane is really not a good idea too since i saw your previous story that u wrote,is tehre anything perfect or safe at all...
londonlad,if u did not inject the amount of macrolane as much as u did,would it be better....i was thinking about marcolane until i saw your statement |
|
|||
|
Quote:
there is no good method of enlargment yet |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|